Home » Zeros » Page 2

Tag: Zeros

Use derivatives to sketch the graph of a function

Let

    \[ f(x) = x^3 - 6x^2 + 9x + 5. \]

  1. Find all points such that f'(x) = 0;
  2. Determine the intervals on which f is monotonic by examining the sign of f';
  3. Determine the intervals on which f' is monotonic by examining the sign of f'';
  4. Sketch the graph of f.

  1. We take the derivative,

        \[ f'(x) = 3x^2 - 12x + 9. \]

    Thus,

        \[ f'(x) = 0 \quad \implies \quad 3x^2 - 12x + 9 = 0 \quad \implies \quad x = \{ 1, 3 \}. \]

  2. f is increasing for x < 1 and x > 3, and decreasing for 1 < x < 3.
  3. Taking the second derivative,

        \[ f''(x) = 6x - 12. \]

    Thus, f' is increasing if x > 2, and decreasing if x < 2.

  4. We sketch the curve,

    Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com

Use derivatives to sketch the graph of a function

Let

    \[ f(x) = (x-1)^2 (x+2). \]

  1. Find all points such that f'(x) = 0;
  2. Determine the intervals on which f is monotonic by examining the sign of f';
  3. Determine the intervals on which f' is monotonic by examining the sign of f'';
  4. Sketch the graph of f.

  1. We take the derivative,

        \begin{align*}  f'(x) &= 2(x-1)(x+2) + (x-1)^2 \\  &= (x-1)(2x + 4 + x - 1) \\  &= (x-1)(3x + 3) \\  &= 3(x^2 -1) \end{align*}

    Thus,

        \[ f'(x) = 0 \quad \implies \quad 3(x^2-1) = 0 \quad \implies \quad x = \pm 1. \]

  2. f is increasing for |x| > 1, and decreasing for |x| < 1.
  3. Taking the second derivative,

        \[ f'(x) = 3(x^2-1) \quad \implies \quad f''(x) = 6x. \]

    Thus, f' is increasing if x > 0, and decreasing if x < 0.

  4. We sketch the curve,

    Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com

Use derivatives to sketch the graph of a function

Let

    \[ f(x) = x^3 - 4x. \]

  1. Find all points such that f'(x) = 0;
  2. Determine the intervals on which f is monotonic by examining the sign of f';
  3. Determine the intervals on which f' is monotonic by examining the sign of f'';
  4. Sketch the graph of f.

  1. We take the derivative,

        \[ f(x) = x^3 - 4x \quad \implies \quad f'(x) = 3x^2 - 4. \]

    Thus,

        \[ f'(x) = 0 \quad \implies \quad 3x^2 - 4 = 0 \quad \implies \quad x = \pm \frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}. \]

  2. Since f'(x) > 0 when |x| > \frac{2}{\sqrt{3}} and f'(x) < 0 when |x| < \frac{2}{\sqrt{3}} we have f is increasing if |x| > \frac{2}{\sqrt{3}} and f is decreasing if |x| < \frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}.
  3. Taking the second derivative,

        \[ f'(x) = 3x^2 - 4 \quad \implies \quad f''(x) = 6x. \]

    Thus, f' is increasing for x > 0; and decreasing for x < 0.

  4. We sketch the curve,

    Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com

Use derivatives to sketch the graph of a function

Let

    \[ f(x) = x^2 - 3x + 2. \]

  1. Find all points such that f'(x) = 0;
  2. Determine the intervals on which f is monotonic by examining the sign of f';
  3. Determine the intervals on which f' is monotonic by examining the sign of f'';
  4. Sketch the graph of f.

  1. We take the derivative,

        \[ f(x) = x^2 - 3x + 2 \quad \implies \quad f'(x) = 2x - 3. \]

    Thus,

        \[ f'(x) = 0 \quad \implies \quad 2x - 3 = 0 \quad \implies \quad x = \frac{3}{2}. \]

  2. Since f'(x) < 0 when x < \frac{3}{2} and f'(x) > 0 when x > \frac{3}{2} we have f is decreasing if x < \frac{3}{2} and f is increasing if x > \frac{3}{2}.
  3. Taking the second derivative,

        \[ f'(x) = 2x - 3 \quad \implies \quad f''(x) = 2. \]

    Since this is positive for all x, this means f' is increasing for all x.

  4. We sketch the curve,

    Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com

Prove the second derivative of a function with a given property must have a zero

Consider a function f which is continuous everywhere on an interval [a,b] and has a second derivative f'' everywhere on the open interval (a,b). Assume the chord joining two points (a, f(a)) and (b, f(b)) on the graph of the function intersects the graph of the function at a point (c, f(c)) with c \in (a,b). Prove there exists a point t \in (a,b) such that f''(t) = 0.


Proof. Let g(x) be the equation of the line joining (a, f(a)) and (b, f(b)). Then define a function

    \[ h(x) = f(x) - g(x). \]

Since f and g intersect at the values a,b, and c this means

    \[ f(a) = g(a), \qquad f(b) = g(b), \qquad f(c) = g(c). \]

By our definition of h then we have

    \[ h(a) = h(b) = h(c) = 0. \]

Further, since f' and g' are continuous and differentiable on (a,b), we apply Rolle’s theorem twice: first on the interval [a,c] and then on the interval [c,b]. These two applications of Rolle’s theorem tells us there exist points c_1 and c_2 such that

    \[ h'(c_1) = h'(c_2) = 0, \qquad \text{with } a < c_1 < c < c_2 < b. \]

Then, we apply Rolle’s theorem for a third time, this time to the function h' on the interval [c_1, c_2] to conclude that there exists a t \in (c_1, c_2) such that h''(t) = 0. Then, since t \in (c_1, c_2) we know t \in (a,b) (since a < c_1 < c_2 < b). So,

    \begin{align*}  h(x) = f(x) - g(x) && \implies && h'(x) &= f'(x) - g'(x) \\  &&  \implies && h''(x) &= f''(x) &(g''(x) = 0 \text{ since } g \text{ is linear}). \end{align*}

Thus, f''(t) = 0 for some t \in (a,b). \qquad \blacksquare

Prove properties about the zeros of a polynomial and its derivatives

Consider a polynomial f. We say a number \alpha is a zero of multiplicity m if

    \[ f(x) = (x - \alpha)^m g(x), \]

where g(\alpha) \neq 0.

  1. Prove that if the polynomial f has r zeros in [a,b], then its derivative f' has at least r-1 zeros in [a,b]. More generally, prove that the kth derivative, f^{(k)} has at least r-k zeros in the interval.
  2. Assume the kth derivative f^{(k)} has exactly r zeros in the interval [a,b]. What can we say about the number of zeros of f in the interval?

  1. Proof. Let \alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_k denote the k distinct zeros of f in [a,b] and m_1, \ldots, m_k their multiplicities, respectively. Thus, the total number of zeros is given by,

        \[ r = \sum_{i=1}^k m_i. \]

    By the definition given in the problem, if \alpha_i is a zero of f of multiplicity m_i then

        \[ f(x) = (x - \alpha_i)^{m_i} g(x) \qquad \text{where } g(x) \neq 0. \]

    Taking the derivative (using the product rule), we have

        \begin{align*}   f'(x) &= m_i (x - \alpha_i)^{m_i - 1} g(x) + (x- \alpha_i)^{m_i} g'(x)\\  &= (x - \alpha_i)^{m_i - 1} (m_i g(x) + (x - \alpha_i) g'(x))  \end{align*}

    Thus, again using the definition given in the problem, \alpha_i is a zero of f'(x) of multiplicity m_i -1.
    Next, we know from the mean-value theorem for derivatives, that for distinct zeros \alpha_i and \alpha_j of f there exists a number c \in [\alpha_i, \alpha_j] (assuming, without loss of generality, that \alpha_i < \alpha_j) such that f'(c) = 0. Hence, if f has k distinct zeros, then the mean value theorem guarantees k-1 numbers c such that f'(c) = 0. Thus, f' has at least:

        \[ \left(\sum_{i=1}^k (m_i -1)\right) + k - 1 = \left( \sum_{i=1}^k m_i \right) - 1 = r-1 \ \ \text{zeros}. \]

    By induction then, the kth derivative f^{(k)}(x) has at least r-k zeros.

  2. If the kth derivative f^{(k)} has exactly r zeros in [a,b], then we can conclude that f has at most r+k zeros in [a,b].

Show that x^2 = x*sin x + cos x for exactly two real numbers x

Consider the equation

    \[ x^2 = x \sin x + \cos x. \]

Show that there are two values of x \in \mathbb{R} such that the equation is satisfied.


Proof. Let f(x) = x^2 - x \sin x - \cos x. (We want then to find the zeros of this function since these will be the points that x^2 = x \sin + \cos x.) Then,

    \[ f'(x) = 2x - \sin x - x \cos x + \sin x = x(2 - \cos x). \]

Since 2 - \cos x \neq 0 for any x (since \cos x \leq 1), we have

    \[ f'(x) = 0 \quad \iff \quad x = 0. \]

Then, f is continuous and differentiable everywhere, so we may apply Rolle’s theorem on any interval. So, by Rolle’s theorem we know f has at most two zeros (if there were three or more, say x_1, x_2, and x_3, then there must be distinct numbers c_1 and c_2 with x_1 < c_1 < x_2 < c_2 < x_3 such that f'(c_1) = f'(c_2) = 0, but we know there is only one c such that f'(c) = 0).
Furthermore, f has at least two zeros since f(-\pi) = \pi^2 + 1 > 0, f(0) = -1 < 0, and f(\pi) = \pi^2 + 1 > 0. Thus, by Bolzano’s theorem there are zeros between each of these points. We have that the number of zeros of f is at most two and at least 2. Hence, the number of zeros must be exactly two. \qquad \blacksquare

Explain why the absence of a zero does not violate Rolle’s theorem

Consider the function

    \[ f(x) = 1 - x^{\frac{2}{3}}. \]

Show that f(1) = 0 and f(-1) = 0, but that the derivative f'(x) \neq 0 for all x \in [-1,1]. Explain why this does not violate Rolle’s theorem.


Proof. First, we show that f(1) = 0 and f(-1) = 0 by a direct computation:

    \begin{align*}    f(1) = 1 - (1)^{\frac{2}{3}} = 1 - 1 &= 0, \\   f(-1) = 1 - (-1)^{\frac{2}{3}} = 1 - (1^2)^\frac{1}{3} = 1 - 1 &= 0. \end{align*}

Then, we compute the derivative,

    \[ f(x) = 1 - x^{\frac{2}{3}} \quad \implies \quad f'(x) = -\frac{2}{3} x^{-\frac{1}{3}}. \]

To show f'(x) \neq 0 for any x \in [-1,1] we consider three cases:

  • If x < 0 then x^{-\frac{1}{3}} < 0 implies f'(x) > 0 (since -\frac{2}{3} times a negative is positive).
  • If x > 0 then x^{-\frac{1}{3}} > 0 implies f'(x) < 0 (since -\frac{2}{3} times a positive is then negative).
  • If x = 0, then f'(x) is undefined (since x^{-\frac{1}{3}} = \frac{1}{x^{1/3}}).

Thus, f'(x) \neq 0 for any x \in [-1,1]. \qquad \blacksquare

This is not a violation of Rolle’s theorem since the theorem requires that f(x) be differentiable for all x on the open interval (-1,1). Since f'(x) is not defined at x = 0, we have f(x) is not differentiable on the whole interval. Hence, Rolle’s theorem does not apply.

Prove there is only one zero of x3 – 3x + b in [-1,1]

Prove, using Rolle’s theorem, that for any value of b there is at most one x \in [-1,1] such that

    \[ x^3 - 3x + b = 0. \]


Proof. The argument is by contradiction. Suppose there are two or more points in [-1,1] for which x^3 - 3x + b = 0. Let x_1, x_2 be two such points with x_1 < x_2. Since x_1, x_2 are both in [-1,1] we have

    \[ -1 \leq x_1 < x_2 \leq 1 \qquad \text{and} \qquad f(x_1) = f(x_2) = 0. \]

Since f(x) = x^3 - 3x + b is continuous on [-1,1] and differentiable on (-1,1) (all polynomials are continuous and differentiable everywhere), we may apply Rolle’s theorem on the interval [x_1, x_2] to conclude that there is some c \in (x_1, x_2) such that

    \[ f'(c) = 0 \quad \implies \quad 3c^2 - 3 = 0 \quad \implies \quad c = \pm 1. \]

But this contradicts that c \in (-1,1) (since c \in (x_1, x_2) and -1 \leq x_1 < x_2 \leq 1). Hence, there can be at most one point x \in [-1,1] such that f(x) = 0. \qquad \blacksquare

Prove there is exactly one negative solution to an equation

Show there is exactly one b < 0 such that b^n = a for a < 0 and n an odd, positive integer.


Proof. Let f(x) = x^n, and let c < -1 with c < a < 0. Then, c^n < c (for odd n) so c^n < c < a < 0. Since f(0) = 0 and f(c) = c^n, by the Intermediate Value Theorem, we know f(x) takes every value between c^n and 0 for some x \in [c,0]. Thus, we know there exists b \in [c,0] such that f(b) = a (since c^n < a < 0). This implies b^n = a for some b \in [c,0].

We know this solution is unique since f is strictly increasing on the whole real line for odd n. \qquad \blacksquare