Nothing to see here. Move along. (At least in my printing, there is no problem 8. To keep the problem numbers intact, I’m leaving this empty.)
Tag: Errata
Find the first four nonzero terms of the power series solution of y′ = x + y2
Consider the differential equation
with initial conditions when . Assume this differential equation has a power-series solution and compute the first four nonzero terms of the expansion.
Let
be the power-series solution of the differential equation. Then we must have
From the initial conditions we know . Then, equating like powers of we can solve for the first four nonzero terms in the power series expansion:
(Note: I think the solution in the back of Apostol is wrong on this. Apostol has , , and . I’m going to mark this as errata until someone convinces me Apostol is actually correct.)
Therefore, we have
Find the first four nonzero terms of the power series solution of y′ = 1 + xy2
Consider the differential equation
with initial conditions when . Assume this differential equation has a power-series solution and compute the first four nonzero terms of the expansion.
Let
be the power series solution of the differential equation. Then we must have
From the initial condition when we know . Therefore, equating like powers of we have
(Note: The book gives the value . I think the answer we have above is correct. I’m marking this as errata unless someone convinces me that Apostol is correct.)
Therefore, we have
Determine all real numbers satisfying given relations
Determine all values for the real numbers and such that the following equations hold.
- .
- .
- .
- .
- .
- .
- The equation
The value of is arbitrary.
- Using the formula for the absolute value of a complex number we have
Since the equation implies which implies . Therefore, this equation is satisfied by
(Note: The answer Apostol gives says , but I think works as well.
- Again, using the formula for the absolute value of a complex number we have
This holds for all real and .
- We compute as follows,
Hence, we must have either and is arbitrary or arbitrary and .
- We compute,
This gives us two equations (since the real parts and imaginary parts must be equal),
If then from the second equation we have
If then we have so or . But, is not impossible since then is undefined. Therefore we have two possibilities
(Note: Apostol only gives the first of these solutions. We can check by a direct substitution that the second solution also works.)
- Here we note that
Therefore, we have
Therefore, from the given equation we have
Compute the limit of the given function
Evaluate the limit.
( Note: There’s a small typo in Apostol which puts a parenthesis in the wrong place. The statement above is what I assume is meant since this evaluates to the answer given in the back of the book.)
To do this we’ll need to get the expression in the limit into the indeterminate form and then apply L’Hopital’s rule twice. (Applying L’Hopital’s is going to be a challenge since the derivatives are going to get quite messy before we get anywhere.) We start by putting things over a common denominator,
Now we want to apply L’Hopital’s. First, we take the derivative of the numerator,
Next, we take the derivative of the denominator,
So, now we use proceed with L’Hopital’s. (Keep in mind that L’Hopital’s is only valid if, once we get to the end, the limits of the derivatives we have taken actually exist, so right now we’re taking derivatives and hoping that the limits exist… once we have established that they do, then the whole process was valid.)
So, we again have the indeterminate form , and again we’ll try to apply L’Hopital’s. The derivative of the numerator is
The derivative of the denominator is
Putting these back into our evaluation of the limit,
But now, we have a quotient of continuous functions with non-zero denominator when so the limit is the value of the function at . Evaluating we then have
Evaluate the integral of 1 / (x2 + x)1/2
Compute the following integral.
We have
Then we make the substitution
Therefore we have
(Note: The answer in the book is wrong, it has . The should be as we have above.)
Evaluate the integral of ((x-a)(b-x))-1/2
Evaluate the following integral for .
(Note: Again, there is an error in the answers in the back of the book for this problem and the previous one. The answers listed for problems #46 and #47 should be swapped.)
Following the hint, we make the substitution
Therefore, we can rewrite this integral in terms of ,
Substituting back in for we then have
Evaluate the integral of ((x-a)(b-x))1/2
Evaluate the following integral for .
(Note: This is a pretty involved problem the way I’ve done it. Maybe there’s a better way? Let me know if you have one. Also, there is an error in the answer in the book on this problem and the next one. The answers given in the book are swapped, so the answer listed for this problem #46 is actually the answer for #47 and vice-versa.)
There are some integrals we’ll want to use to carry out the evaluation of the above integral. First, from previous exercises here and here (Section 5.10, Exercises #7 and #10(b)) we know
Therefore, (we’ll want this later), we have
The other integral that we are going to want to have available is
To evaluate this we’ll use the trig integrals above. First, make the substitution
and also gives us
Therefore we have
Then, substituting back in for (and noting that and ) we have
So, now that we have those, we can turn our attention to the integral in the question. For this integral we want to make the substitution
which implies
Therefore we have
Now, we want to make the substitution
and implies
Therefore,
Now, we can use the work we did above in the evaluation of this integral,
Finally, we have to unwind our substitutions to get back to a function of . We have
Therefore,
This completes our evaluation of the integral.
Find indefinite integrals of powers of sin
From the previous two exercises (here and here) we know
and
Use these results to establish the following formulas:
- .
- .
- .
( Note: There is an error in my edition of the book for part (c). It requests we prove , omitting the in the first term of the result. This is just an error in the book since the formula as stated is false.)
- Using the second formula, and the triple angle identity for cosine ( which implies , derived in this exercise), we have
- Using the second formula above and then the first we have (and also recalling the trig identity which implies ),
- Using the second formula above and then part (a) we have
Establish the given limit formula
Prove the formula for the limit:
Using,
( Note: I think there is an error in this problem as stated in Apostol. The statement in the book is for the limit as . However, the limit as of this is not (since it is a quotient of continuous functions and for the denominator is nonzero at ). I’ve changed the statement of the question to be the limit as approaches . This makes the given formula correct, so is probably what was intended.)
Proof. From Theorem 2.3 (g) (Apostol, p. 96) we know
So, evaluating the limit we have,
But then,
where,
So,