- Given the two formulas:
Identify which one is always correct and which one is sometimes wrong, and prove the result.
- Give an additional condition for the incorrect formula to be always true.
- The formula
is false in general.
- To make the first formula in part (a) always correct, we add the condition that
. The claim is then:
If, then
.
Proof. Letbe any element in
, then
and
. But,
means that
or
(since this is the negation of
which means
and
, so its negation is
or
). So, if
, then
and hence
. On the other hand, if
, then
as well. Hence,
.
For the reverse inclusion, let. Then
or
. If
, then
and
. Since,
, then we know
(since every
must be in
). Therefore,
. On the other hand, if
, then since
(by our additional hypothesis) we know
. Further, since
, we know
. Therefore,
. So,
.
Therefore, indeed,.∎
Proof. Let
Then,
Thus, the formula does not hold in this counterexample.∎
The formula is correct.
Proof. Let be any element of
. This means
and
, which in turn means
and
. Since
and
we have
. Then, since
, we have
. Thus,
.
For the reverse inclusion, let be any element of
. This gives us
and
. The first part in turn gives us
and
. But then we have
in neither
nor
; hence,
. Since
, we then have
. Therefore,
.
Therefore, .∎