Home » Blog » Prove some properties of a differentiable function satisfying a given functional equation

Prove some properties of a differentiable function satisfying a given functional equation

Let g be a function differentiable everywhere such that

    \[ g'(0) = 2 \quad \text{and} \quad g(x+y) = e^y g(x) + e^x g(y) \qquad \text{for all } x,y \in \mathbb{R}. \]

  1. Prove that g(2x) = 2e^x g(x) and conjecture and prove a similar formula for g(3x).
  2. Conjecture and prove a formula for g(nx) in terms of g(x) for all positive integers n.
  3. Prove that g(0) = 0 and compute

        \[ \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{g(h)}{h}. \]

  4. Prove that there exists a constant C such that

        \[ g'(x) = g(x) + Ce^x \]

    for all x. Find the value of the constant C.


  1. Proof. We can compute this using the functional equation:

        \[ g(2x) = g(x+x) = e^x g(x) + e^x g(x) = 2e^x g(x). \qquad \blacksquare \]

    Next, we conjecture

        \[ g(3x) = 3e^{2x} g(x). \]

    Proof. Again, we compute using the functional equation, and the above formula for g(2x),

        \begin{align*}  g(3x) &= g(2x + x) \\  &= e^x g(2x) + e^{2x}g(x) \\  &= e^x (2e^x g(x)) + e^{2x} g(x) \\  &= 2e^{2x}g(x) + e^{2x}g(x) \\  &= 3e^{2x}g(x). \qquad \blacksquare \end{align*}

  2. We conjecture

        \[ g(nx) = ne^{(n-1)x} g(x). \]

    Proof. The proof is by induction. We have already established the cases n = 2 and n = 3 (and the n = 1 case is the trivial g(x) = g(x)). Assume then that the formula holds for some integer k \geq 1. Then we have

        \begin{align*}  g((k+1)x) &= g(kx + x) \\  &= e^x g(kx) + e^{kx} g(x) &(\text{functional equation})\\  &= e^x (ke^{(k-1)x} g(x)) + e^{kx}g(x) &(\text{induction hypothesis}) \\  &= ke^{kx} g(x) + e^{kx} g(x) \\  &= (k+1)e^{kx} g(x). \end{align*}

    Thus, if the formula holds for k, it also holds for k + 1. Hence, by induction it holds for all integers k. \qquad \blacksquare

  3. Proof. Using the functional equation

        \[ g(0) = g(0+0) = e^0 g(0) + e^0 g(0) = 2g(0) \quad \implies \quad g(0) = 0. \]

    Then, since the derivative g'(x) exists for all x (by hypothesis) we know it must exist in particular at x = 0. Using the limit definition of derivative, and the facts that g(0) = 0 and g'(0) = 2 we have

        \[ g'(0) = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{g(0+h) - g(0)}{h} = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{g(h)}{h} = 2. \qquad \blacksquare\]

  4. Proof. Since the derivative g'(x) must exist for all x (by hypothesis) we know that the limit

        \[ \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{g(x+h) - g(x)}{h} \]

    must exist for all x. Using the functional equation for g we have

        \begin{align*}  \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{g(x+h) - g(x)}{h} &= \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{e^h g(x) + e^x g(h) - g(x)}{h} \\[9pt]  &= \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{g(x)(e^h - 1) + e^x g(h)}{h}. \end{align*}

    But then, from part (c) we know \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{g(h)}{h} = 2 and from this exercise (Section 6.17, Exercise #38) we know

        \[ \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{e^x - 1}{x} = 1. \]

    Therefore, we have

        \begin{align*}  \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{g(x)(e^h - 1) + e^x g(h)}{h} &= \lim_{h \to 0} \left( \frac{e^x g(h)}{h} \right) + \lim_{h \to 0} \left( \frac{g(x)(e^h - 1)}{h} \right) \\  &= e^x \lim_{h \to 0} \left(\frac{g(h)}{h} \right) + g(x) \lim_{h \to 0} \left( \frac{e^h-1}{h} \right) \\  &= 2e^x + g(x). \qquad \blacksquare \end{align*}

Point out an error, ask a question, offer an alternative solution (to use Latex type [latexpage] at the top of your comment):