From Example 4 of Section 2.3 of Apostol, we know that given a nonnegative, integrable function on an interval
, and the area of the ordinate set of
is
, then if we define a function
, we have,
Generalize this formula and prove the result.
To generalize this, we proceed as follows.
Let be a nonnegative integrable function on
, and let
be the ordinate set of
. If we apply a transformation under which we multiply the
-coordinate of each point
on the graph of
by a constant
and each
-coordinate by a constant
, then we obtain a new function
were a point
is on
if and only if
is on
. Then,
Letting denote the ordinate set of
:
I think it would be better to prove that the ordinate set of the new graph is measurable first. To do this, the solution (the part from a(S) to jk . a(S)) only needed to be written in a reverse order
The integration interval Is [ka,jb].
No, [ka, kb] is correct. The horizontal scale factor is k. The interval [ka, kb] is the horizontal dimension (along the x-axis) of the ordinate set of g, after the ordinate set of f is scaled horizontally by k and vertically by j.
Richard, why do you assume that “the horizontal scale factor is k”? The problem statement says nothing about scaling [a, b] by the same factor in both ends, and you could perfectly scale the left-end by ka and the right end by jb, yielding the interval [ka, jb].
The integration interval for the function G (x) is wrong … it is not [ka, kb]