Home » Blog » Sums, differences, products and quotients of an irrational and a rational are irrational.

Sums, differences, products and quotients of an irrational and a rational are irrational.

Prove that if x \in \mathbb{Q} with x \neq 0, and y \in \mathbb{R} \smallsetminus \mathbb{Q}, then

    \[ x+y,\quad x-y, \quad xy, \quad \frac{x}{y}, \quad \frac{y}{x}  \]

are all irrational, i.e., are all in \mathbb{R} \smallsetminus \mathbb{Q}.


Proof. Since x \in \mathbb{Q}, we know there are integers m and n such that x = \frac{m}{n}. Now we consider each of the elements we wish to show are irrational.

  1. Suppose otherwise, that x+y \in \mathbb{Q}. Then, there exist r,s \in \mathbb{Z} such that

        \[ x+y = \frac{r}{s} \ \implies \ \frac{m}{n} +y = \frac{r}{s} \ \implies \ y = \frac{r}{s} - \frac{m}{n} \implies \ y = \frac{rn - ms}{sn} \ \implies \ y \in \mathbb{Q}. \]

    This contradicts our assumption that y is irrational.

  2. Since y is irrational, so is -y (by part (a), the sum of a rational and an irrational cannot be rational and since y+(-y) = 0 is rational, cannot have -y rational). But then, x-y = x+(-y) and by part (a) this sum must be irrational.
  3. Suppose otherwise, that xy \in \mathbb{Q}. Then there exist r,s \in \mathbb{Z} such that xy = \frac{r}{s}. Further, since x \neq 0, we know x^{-1} = \frac{n/m} exists.

        \[ xy = \frac{r}{s} \ \implies \ \frac{m}{n} y = \frac{r}{s} \ \implies \ y = \frac{r}{s} \frac{n}{m} \ \implies \ y = \frac{rn}{sm} \in \mathbb{Q}. \]

    Contradicting our assumption that y is irrational.

  4. First, we since y is irrational, we have y \neq 0, and thus y^{-1} exists. Further, since yy^{-1} = 1 is rational, and y is irrational, by (c) we must have y^{-1} irrational as well. Then by (c), since \frac{x}{y} = xy^{-1}, we must have xy^{-1} irrational.
  5. By (d) we know \frac{x}{y} is irrational, and since \frac{x}{y} \frac{y}{x} = 1 is rational, by (c), we must have \frac{y}{x} irrational.

One comment

Point out an error, ask a question, offer an alternative solution (to use Latex type [latexpage] at the top of your comment):