If and for all , then .
Proof. Suppose otherwise, that for all , but . Then, we have and implies , so is a positive real number. Then let (since this is a valid choice of ). By assumption we then have (since for all ), but this is a contradiction since (equality is symmetric) implies . Therefore, we must have
Even when is well known that “equality” is an equivalence relation (i.e symmetric) we can prove that x<x cannot hold since if it happens, then x-x is in R+, which means, 0 is in R+, leading to a contradiction with the first Axiom of order.
Can you please explain how you are taking h=x ? I am not able to understand it.