Home » Blog » Prove some properties of the integral logarithm, Li (x)

# Prove some properties of the integral logarithm, Li (x)

The integral logarithm is defined for by Prove the following properties of .

1. .
2. where is a constant depending on . Find the value of for each .
3. Prove there exists a constant such that and find the value of this constant.

4. Let . Find an expression for in terms of .

5. Define a function for by Prove that 1. Proof. We derive this by integrating by parts. Let Then we have 2. Proof. The proof is by induction. Starting with part (a) we have To evaluate the integral in this expression we integrate by parts with This gives us Therefore we have where . This is the case . Now, assume the formula hold for some integer . Then we have We then evaluate the integral in this expression using integration by parts, as before, let Therefore, we have Plugging this back into the expression we had from the induction hypothesis we obtain Therefore, the formula holds for the case , and hence, for all integers , where  and make the substitution , . This gives us . Therefore, where is a constant 4. (Note: In the comments, tom correctly suggests an easier way to do this is to use part (c) along with translation and expansion/contraction of the integral. The way I have here works also, but requires an inspired choice of substitution.) We start with the given integral, and make the substitution Therefore, using the given fact that , we have 5. From part (d) we know that Then, for the term we consider the integral where . Similar to part (d) we make the substitution, This gives us Therefore, we have Taking the derivative we then have 1. Artem says:

Part (d) can be done naturally with 2 substitutions: first one u = t – 1. After this substitution the integral will resemble the integral in part (c) – from where we should get an inspiration to do the second substitution to make the integral look like in (c), and the conclude the result

Part (e) can be done with the 1st theorem of calculus. 1/log(t) is continuous for the positive t, so the derivative of Li(x) at e^{2x – 2} is simply 1/log(e^{2x-2}). Then the chain rule is used.

2. tom says:

Part (d) can be done using the translation and expansion properties along with part (c). Your substitution was interesting, but at this stage might have eluded me.

• tom says:

Though admittedly it would be more difficult to guess the identity in part (c) so your solution is appreciated.

• RoRi says:

Oh, there was also a typo in part (d). I had something an integral of instead of . Fixed now. Anyway, you’re right doing this using part (c) is easier. I’m not sure why I went with this substitution… it is not an obvious one to make at all. (I’m sure that I chose it because of the value of the constant we are given in the problem.) I’ll put in a note directing people to your comment, but I’ll leave the substitution solution up there since it’s still correct and maybe people will like to see an overly complicated way to do it.